ETAR 22-07-2012

ImageThe forum for all movements and news about Ramstein Air Base.

Forum rules
ImageMode S / SBS and radio logs, airfield specific, are allowed, but always state your source, mode S / SBS or air traffic conversations. These logs can be placed in the "day topic" so a separate Mode S / SBS radio log is not necessary
Post Reply
forzafil
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 117
Joined: 10 Dec 2011, 09:53
Type of spotter: s4
Subscriber Scramble: forzafil

ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by forzafil »

0900

C17a
00180 62aw
80265 62aw
99211 62aw
99209 62aw
70042 62aw
00184 72aw
55141 452aw
33114 172aw
33115 172aw
....3? 437aw hot cargo
70042 c5b 439aw
70045 c5b 105aw
80075 kc135r
40190 kc10a 305amw

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Top
forzafil
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 117
Joined: 10 Dec 2011, 09:53
Type of spotter: s4
Subscriber Scramble: forzafil

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by forzafil »

60202 c20b dep 11.55
00213 c17a 437aw hot cargo

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Top
User avatar
Eric van Lisdonk
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2566
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 23:33
Subscriber Scramble: Eric van Lisdonk
Location: Ramstein and Gilze-Rijen Air Base

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by Eric van Lisdonk »

forzafil wrote:0900

C17a
00180 62aw
80265 62aw
99211 62aw
99209 62aw
70042 62aw
00184 72aw
55141 452aw
33114 172aw
33115 172aw
....3? 437aw hot cargo
70042 c5b 439aw
70045 c5b 105aw
80075 kc135r
40190 kc10a 305amw

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Nice report. I have some corrections for you.
33115 must be 33116
70045 is not a C-5B but a C-17A from 105AW
70042 C-5B are you sure about this one?? I have 70038 but that could be a Mode-S box change???

Cheers,
Eric
Top
forzafil
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 117
Joined: 10 Dec 2011, 09:53
Type of spotter: s4
Subscriber Scramble: forzafil

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by forzafil »

Thanks It was very early! 70038 C5 439aw er was also à other C5 from stewart the 7004.?

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Top
forzafil
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 117
Joined: 10 Dec 2011, 09:53
Type of spotter: s4
Subscriber Scramble: forzafil

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by forzafil »

70033 c5b 438aw arr. 13.15
90014 c5a 174aw arr. 13.23

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Top
Viper810
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 874
Joined: 09 Sep 2009, 11:43
Location: 4,1 NM from ETUR/MILGI
Contact:
Contact Viper810

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by Viper810 »

AMCC REACH 647
Aircraft: C-17A
Serial: 03-3127 | 305AMW | 6AS [McGuire AFB]
25 min out, A2 status.
Last edited by Viper810 on 22 Jul 2012, 13:50, edited 1 time in total.
Check http://www.youtube.com/user/Vipers810 for my spotting and airshow video`s.
Top
User avatar
Eric van Lisdonk
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2566
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 23:33
Subscriber Scramble: Eric van Lisdonk
Location: Ramstein and Gilze-Rijen Air Base

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by Eric van Lisdonk »

forzafil wrote:70033 c5b 438aw arr. 13.15
90014 c5a 174aw arr. 13.23

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
It looks like that you are still have to wake up hahaha.
70033 is from 439AW not 438AW
90014 is from 164AW not 174AW
And for your info Stewart never had C-5B's!! So 70045 must be your bird as a C-17 from Stewart. Maybe you can do a double check later this day??

Cheers,
Eric
Last edited by Eric van Lisdonk on 22 Jul 2012, 14:34, edited 2 times in total.
Top
Viper810
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 874
Joined: 09 Sep 2009, 11:43
Location: 4,1 NM from ETUR/MILGI
Contact:
Contact Viper810

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by Viper810 »

Eric van Lisdonk wrote:
forzafil wrote:70033 c5b 438aw arr. 13.15
90014 c5a 174aw arr. 13.23

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
It looks like that you are still have to wake up hahaha.
70033 is from 439AW not 438AW
90014 is from 164AW not 174AW
And for your info Stewart never had C-5B's!! So 70045 must be your bird as a C-17 from Stewart. Maybe you can do a double check later this day??

Cheers,
Eric
Uhum. Stewart does have C-5's but only A and no C-17'S.
Last edited by Viper810 on 22 Jul 2012, 14:05, edited 3 times in total.
Check http://www.youtube.com/user/Vipers810 for my spotting and airshow video`s.
Top
Viper810
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 874
Joined: 09 Sep 2009, 11:43
Location: 4,1 NM from ETUR/MILGI
Contact:
Contact Viper810

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by Viper810 »

Another AMCC Call
REACH 540
Aircraft: C-17A
Serial: 08-8204 | 437AW [Charleston AFB]
Check http://www.youtube.com/user/Vipers810 for my spotting and airshow video`s.
Top
User avatar
Eric van Lisdonk
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2566
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 23:33
Subscriber Scramble: Eric van Lisdonk
Location: Ramstein and Gilze-Rijen Air Base

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by Eric van Lisdonk »

Viper810 wrote:
Eric van Lisdonk wrote:
forzafil wrote:70033 c5b 438aw arr. 13.15
90014 c5a 174aw arr. 13.23

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
It looks like that you are still have to wake up hahaha.
70033 is from 439AW not 438AW
90014 is from 164AW not 174AW
And for your info Stewart never had C-5B's!! So 70045 must be your bird as a C-17 from Stewart. Maybe you can do a double check later this day??

Cheers,
Eric
Uhum. Stewart does have C-5's and not C-17'S
Now day's they have no longer a C-5 in use. The C-17's are replacing the old C-5A's.
New for the unit 105AW are:
89-1191
92-3293
93-0602
94-0067
95-0103
95-0105
97-0041
97-0045
98-0057

Cheers,
Eric
Top
Viper810
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 874
Joined: 09 Sep 2009, 11:43
Location: 4,1 NM from ETUR/MILGI
Contact:
Contact Viper810

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by Viper810 »

70033 is indeed 439AW from Westover.
Live mode shows 69-0014 from | 164AW | 155AS [Memphis Int] my serial book from 2011 shows 433AW Kelly Field.
Could have changed from Wing.
Eric van Lisdonk wrote:Now day's they have no longer a C-5 in use. The C-17's are replacing the old C-5A's.
I thought only the Wright Patterson C-5's where replaced by the C-17's. Maybe i'm wrong.
Check http://www.youtube.com/user/Vipers810 for my spotting and airshow video`s.
Top
User avatar
Eric van Lisdonk
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2566
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 23:33
Subscriber Scramble: Eric van Lisdonk
Location: Ramstein and Gilze-Rijen Air Base

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by Eric van Lisdonk »

Viper810 wrote:70033 is indeed 439AW from Westover.
Live mode shows 69-0014 from | 164AW | 155AS [Memphis Int] my serial book from 2011 shows 433AW Kelly Field.
Could have changed from Wing.
Eric van Lisdonk wrote:Now day's they have no longer a C-5 in use. The C-17's are replacing the old C-5A's.
I thought only the Wright Patterson C-5's where replaced by the C-17's. Maybe i'm wrong.
Sorry that i have to tell you that you are indeed wrong. I make allready some pics from Stewart C-17's this year in Ramstein.
Top
AMC
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 495
Joined: 26 May 2008, 13:53
Subscriber Scramble: AMC

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by AMC »

Eric van Lisdonk wrote:
forzafil wrote:70033 c5b 438aw arr. 13.15
90014 c5a 174aw arr. 13.23

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
It looks like that you are still have to wake up hahaha.
70033 is from 439AW not 438AW
90014 is from 433AW not 174AW
And for your info Stewart never had C-5B's!! So 70045 must be your bird as a C-17 from Stewart. Maybe you can do a double check later this day??

Cheers,
Eric
69-0014 came in with sun RWY 08 and it is in 164thAW/TN ANG markings. 97-0045 C-17A 105thAW/NY ANG on Ramp 5.
Top
AMC
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 495
Joined: 26 May 2008, 13:53
Subscriber Scramble: AMC

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by AMC »

Viper810 wrote:Another AMCC Call
REACH 540
Aircraft: C-17A
Serial: 08-8204 | 437AW [Charleston AFB]
08-8204 came in also with sun and land a few mikes ago. 87-0033 land without the sun! 58-0075 also depart.
Top
User avatar
FISHER01
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3320
Joined: 13 May 2004, 21:33
Type of spotter: DIE HARD
Subscriber Scramble: Yups
Location: Enschede, 5 miles south south east of EHTW
Contact:
Contact FISHER01

Re: ETAR 22-07-2012

Post by FISHER01 »

But! was the 87-0038 439AW also there on the ramp or not?
greetzz. Jos FISHER01 K.™

Image
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Ramstein”