Scramble Messageboard

Hi, Noted between 15.00h and 17.00h were the following: locals: 8 8601/RS C-130J-30 37AS '86AW' 88602/RS C-130J-30 37AS '86OG' 06-8610/RS C-130J-30 37AS 07-8613/RS C-130J-30 37AS 07-8614/RS C-130J-30 37AS ... C-21A 76AS I didn't read the special markings on 8601, but the serial and tailcode were hig...

Hi, Noted 09.00-09.20h were the following (straight from the logbook): locals: 08-8607/RS C-130J-30 37AS 07-8608/RS C-130J-30 37AS 07-8609/RS C-130J-30 37AS 07-8613/RS C-130J-30 37AS + 1 visitors: ... CC-144 nn (CF) 68-0211 C-5A 167AS/WVANG 87-0035 C-5B 436AW 87-0037 C-5B 337AS/AFRC 87-0039 C-5B 337...

Hi, A little belated log, straight from the book, but hopefully still useful to someone. Any help with the departing C-12 would be gratefully received. Noted around 19.40-21.00h were: visitors: ... CC-144 nn (CF) 68-0211 C-5A 167AS/WVANG 87-0035 C-5B 436AW 87-0037 C-5B 337AS/AFRC 87-0039 C-5B 337AS/...

Thanks René, both were new for me by the way.

Hi René, KC-135R 60-0329/HH 203 ARS/ HI ANG KC-135T 58-0099 171 ARW/PA ANG Do you recall which KC-135 was parked closest to the three C-17s? I drove by around 18.00h and from the parking spot along the highway I could only see one in full, plus two tails (presumably the other KC and the CC-150) hidd...

Hi,

On 21 April 2011, approximately between 1815h and 1825h, the following was present on the ramp:

87-0031 C-5B 337AS/AFRC
03-3113 C-17A 183AS/MsANG
08-8194 C-17A 62AW

HTH,
Joris

Hi Oscar, I have some remarks: 84-1278/AZ 90-0735/AZ 70-0793/AZ - I believe 84-1278 is actually carrying the tailcode AT, please confirm. - I think 90-0735 is a mispole, since this is a Block 40 aircraft (l/n oct09 WP yl) while 162nd FW is using Block 42 aircraft. - Could you confirm 90-0793 active ...

Hi Crizz,

Crizz wrote:Here a log from an on base visit to Albacete on 27-01-2011.

TLP participants
654 Mirage 2000D

Have you been able to check the con number of this one? Still unknown as far as I know.

MTIA,
Joris

Hi Rogier, Could you confirm these pictures were all taken in October 2010 unless otherwise stated? I see 84-1258 and 84-1375 on your pictures, but these two also appear on the AMARG inventory list (arriving 30 June 2010 and 16 July 2010 respectively) per http://www.amarc.info . Do you have a full l...

Hi Tally,

tally wrote:Here some notes from last Friday.

Visitors:
F-16C AZ ANG "AZ"
86-0254, 86-0241, 84-1278

Could you please confirm the first one, 86-0254, since this one was inducted into AMARG on 23 June 2010.
I believe the tail code should actually be "AT", is this correct?

MTIA,
Joris

Hi, A press release stated that a crew chief dedication ceremony was held on 13 August 2010 for 29 crew chiefs, so I suspect that amount equals the number of F-16's at Spangdahlem. That would back-up the numbers I have: 18 departed to Duluth 1 departed to Edwards 29may10 (91-0464) 1 to be repaired i...

Hi, 90-0843 was according to ODW last reported at 13.08.2010. I had already noticed that. On 13 August 2010, 480th FS was reactivated. I suspect that the On Dutch Wings website therefore uses this date as the oldest 'last noted' date for all F-16's that they put under the 480th FS, and I am not conv...

Hi, I come up with 2231 F-16's 'delivered' to the USAF: 785 F-16A/B 713 F-16C/D (incl. 1 NF-16D) 462 F-16CG/DG 271 F-16CJ/DJ This number is excluding the 2 YF-16's and 8 F-16A/B FSD aircraft, but including aircraft that never made it into USAF service (1 was lost during pre-acceptance test flight, 1...

Planned for the next two days is the departure from the last F-16´s for Duluth. Six will depart tomorrow and three more on Friday. Anyone heard the last three departing today on the boomer maybe? Would be nice to know the serials. Did the final three F-16's destined for Duluth actually leave on Fri...

Woensdrecht probably was the destination indeed, as I saw a low loader with an F-16 fuselage entering the main gate of the base around lunch break today.

HTH,
Joris