Scramble Messageboard

91-26338 is not correct. It is a miscode of UH-60V 91-26339, which was one of the first six UH-60Vs which arrived on 27Jul21.
91-26349 is also a UH-60V

08-20128 is the 12th aircraft.

21130 is based at Grafenwohr in Germany.

21108 is actually a UH-60M. It arrived on 6Aug22 and was previously with the NY-NG.
The reason for its presence at Rapid City is unknown to me.

All the ones up to 20-21151 are correct.
All the later ones (22-21230 and up) have nothing to do the the NJ ARNG.
The delivery center is at Lakehurst. New-build helicopters are flown there from the factory at Bridgeport for final fitting out before onward delivery to their new operating location.

Minor observation on the overview, 46+64 does not exist.

Super, look forward to that.
They are UH-60Ls by the way, the Army withdrew their HH-60Ls a while back. Most operate with the DOS Air Wing these days.

Thanks. Do you have the serials of the USARC choppers please? I can see one is 26447.

This is manageable.
Less so if it spreads to Air Combat Command…

Piet Luijken wrote: ↑20 Feb 2023, 23:57 87-0255 was parked inside the hangar with the Texas Flag c/s and marked 80-0149

The F-16 marked "80-0149" is weapons trainer 80-0526.
"87-0255" are the marks worn by the preserved machine, 80-0567.

AG305/166955 was photographed at Albacete yesterday: https://www.fightercontrol.co.uk/forum/ ... 5#p1480265

Can you reconfirm NJ-564 please Piet?
This should be 166933.
168933 is NL-544, seen and read a couple of weeks ago.

NE601 was 169864 in Sep22.

Thanks for the log!
UH-72B 72471 (FY22 I think) actually belongs to C(-)/3-140th AVN (New Mexico NG).
It flew Las Cruces-Tucson-Pinal on the day you saw it:
https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=ae ... 2023-02-05

I have now seen photo confirmation that F-35B 02 (no CE) of VMFA-225 was indeed 169920, so a mispole by us.
Thanks to those who spotted it (and sorted it).