 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
Me neither! It's a great looking beast; many similarities to the C-17 of course, but with the additional benefit of those huge props.can't believe there are still people who consider this plane to be ugly...
This strategy is called "wishful thinking" and is often used by marketeersAntilliaan wrote:Beauty is a matter of opinion, but why would Airbus still display the South African flag on the aircraft, since their order has been canceled before it made its first flight? The marketeers could do better...
Nice engines.
I think most of them consider it ugly just because it's an Airbus.....
Still looks like a C-17 with props ..... and a C-160 Transall "face" ......Wow, can't believe there are still people who consider this plane to be ugly...
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
/cathay.gif)
