Search found 285 matches

by Paul van der Linden
05 Jul 2010, 21:39
Forum: Spotting Rest of Europe
Topic: Port Visits South France -2010
Replies: 30
Views: 8080

Re: Port Visits South France -2010

Hello, sorry to disturb everyone after almost 2 weeks with such questions, but I hope somebody is able to help me with two queries regarding the Truman! 1. Does anyone know maybe, which SH-60F was behind the left Prowler (you could see only the cockpit from the city), on the forward part of the shi...
by Paul van der Linden
05 Jul 2010, 20:21
Forum: Airshow news!
Topic: Beauvechain AB 3/4 juli 2010
Replies: 150
Views: 51802

Re: Beauvechain AB 3/4 juli 2010

However I got an answer from Beauvechain at the website linked before. They are gonna giving back the money. here the reply that I put as they say to advise other spotters: Thanks for you email. I heard from a lot of you colleagues "spotters" that the civilian organization during this spotters' day...
by Paul van der Linden
04 Jul 2010, 22:38
Forum: Airshow news!
Topic: Beauvechain AB 3/4 juli 2010
Replies: 150
Views: 51802

Re: Beauvechain AB 3/4 juli 2010

Witch 2 RAF Tornado's came in on Saturday around 14:30. And someone a reg. for the France CN235 and 4 A109's near the rwy that were flying. Hi Crizz, I saw no reply to the last question so here it is: One of the four A109s flew a solo display in the late morning; this was H26 The three in the 'air ...
by Paul van der Linden
01 Jul 2010, 18:39
Forum: Volkel
Topic: NATO Tiger Meet participants list
Replies: 17
Views: 8478

Re: NATO Tiger Meet participants list

Guys,

I assume that the NATO Tiger Association is aware of the existence of the other tiger units so I guess that there is some kind of a good reason that they are not on the list.

In addition, the list is provisional which means that some units might be added or even deleted.

Greetings, Paul
by Paul van der Linden
27 Jun 2010, 23:00
Forum: Spotting Germany
Topic: Laupheim (ETHL) - 2010 MIL
Replies: 2
Views: 1123

Re: Laupheim 24-6

Stefan wrote:Hi Paul,

Interesting log, but...
Paul van der Linden wrote:HFR25
changed to MTHR25 some time ago...

Regards,
Stefan
O ja... :oops:
by Paul van der Linden
27 Jun 2010, 01:13
Forum: Spotting Germany
Topic: Laupheim (ETHL) - 2010 MIL
Replies: 2
Views: 1123

Laupheim (ETHL) - 2010 MIL

Noted here 24-06-2010 around 15:00 were the following:

HFR25 CH-53G:
84+33 84+38 84+52 84+53 84+82
84+95 84+97 85+10

85+10 was somewhat difficult to read and requires confirmation. This helicopter had ISAF markings.

Three Bo105s remained unidentified.
by Paul van der Linden
27 Jun 2010, 01:10
Forum: Spotting Germany
Topic: Lechfeld (ETSL) - 2010 MIL
Replies: 24
Views: 7995

Lechfeld (ETSL) - 2010 MIL

Noted during the spottersday on the 24th were the following: JBG32 Tornado IDS: 43+08 43+37 44+30 45+41 JBG32 Tornado ECR 46+34 46+41 46+46 46+50 46+56 ‘Elite 2010’ participants were the following: 44+65 Tornado IDS AG51 45+35 Tornado IDS AG51 45+86 Tornado IDS JBG33 041 Falcon 20ECM FEKS 053 Falcon...
by Paul van der Linden
27 Jun 2010, 01:01
Forum: Spotting Germany
Topic: Landsberg (ETSA) - 2010 MIL
Replies: 10
Views: 3124

Landsberg 23-6

Noted at Landsberg on 23-06-2010 around 19:30 hrs were: LTG61 C160D: 50+07 50+35+ 50+36+ 50+44? 50+48wh 50+49 50+64 50+69 50+88? 50+93+ 50+98 50+99 51+10? 51+15wh LTG61 UH-1D: 70+88 71+11 71+36 R226/64-GZ C 160R ET 00.064 021 C 295M 13.eltr T.21-10/35-48 C 295M Ala35 + = LTG62 mks ? = nn wh = white ...
by Paul van der Linden
27 Jun 2010, 00:56
Forum: Spangdahlem
Topic: ETAD 24-06-2010
Replies: 0
Views: 580

ETAD 24-06-2010

Noted around 21:00 hrs were:


84-0061 C-5B 436AW/9AS
02-1112 C-17A 183AS/MS-ANG
07-7175 C-17A 436AW/3AS
by Paul van der Linden
27 Jun 2010, 00:55
Forum: Spangdahlem
Topic: ETAD 23-06-2010
Replies: 0
Views: 471

ETAD 23-06-2010

Only two C-5s on the platform around 13:00 hrs:


84-0061 C-5B 436AW
86-0022 C-5B 60AMW
by Paul van der Linden
27 Jun 2010, 00:53
Forum: Ramstein
Topic: ETAR 24-06-2010
Replies: 0
Views: 576

ETAR 24-06-2010

Noted around 19:30 hrs were the following: 86AW/37AS: C-130J-30 : RS/08-8601 RS/08-8603 RS/08-8605 RS/08-8606 RS/07-8608 RS/08-8610 RS/06-8611 RS/06-8612 8601 special mks for the “86AW” c/o, 8603 for the “37AS” c/o. 86AW/76AS : C-21A : 84-0082 84-0083 84-010. 85-0003 C-5B 436AW/9AS 87-0040 C-5B 60AM...
by Paul van der Linden
27 Jun 2010, 00:51
Forum: Ramstein
Topic: ETAR 23-06-2010
Replies: 0
Views: 587

ETAR 23-06-2010

Noted around 14:00 hrs were the following: 86AW/37AS : C-130J-30 : RS/08-8606 RS/07-8608 RS/08-8610 RS/06-8612 RS/07-8614 86AW/76AS : C-21A : 84-0082 84-0083 +3 69-0010 C-5A 155AS/TN-ANG 85-0003 C-5B 436AW/9AS 76-0160 C-12C USE Ryadh? 90-0534 C-17A 437AW 94-0069 C-17A 437AW 97-0048 C-17A 437AW 99-00...
by Paul van der Linden
25 Jun 2010, 12:32
Forum: Spotting Germany
Topic: Lechfeld (ETSL) - 2010 MIL
Replies: 24
Views: 7995

Re: Lechfeld (ETSL) - 2010 MIL

Following are a few missing serials, from 24-6 Turkish F-4 77-0298 (read from photo) English Tornado's ZA401/012 and ZA562/051 (read with binocular) Question: Anyone for the Bo105 which landed?? With regards, Brian Hi Brian, The Bo105 was 86+33. Which of the Tornado's was parked on the right hand s...
by Paul van der Linden
23 Jun 2010, 00:20
Forum: Spotting Rest of Europe
Topic: Istres-Le Tubé (LFMI/QIE) - MIL 2010
Replies: 42
Views: 12174

Re: Istres-Le Tubé (LFMI/QIE) - MIL 2010

F-16D 661 145sqn/Singapore AF F-16D 662 145sqn/Singapore AF F-16D 674 145sqn/Singapore AF F-16D 679 145sqn/Singapore AF [/quote] The first two were read as 662 and 674. Can somebody confirm the second pair as 661 and 679, because some Volkel spotters read also 662 in the this pair !!!!!!!!!!!! Mirag...
by Paul van der Linden
21 Jun 2010, 19:08
Forum: Spotting Rest of Europe
Topic: Orange - Caritat (LFMO) - MIL 2010
Replies: 22
Views: 7374

Re: Orange - Caritat (LFMO) - MIL 2010

eriktex wrote:I logged Mirage 2000 "115-LE" at Orange on June 14th (yes, the day of the Orange victory in South Africa as well), probably during the overshoots with the Indians.

Can anyone confirm that this was the "79"?


Thanks,


Erik
79 is correct!

Greetings, Paul