Just see the post above yours ... and the linkStarfighter_F-104G wrote:it has been reported as 165570
probably 168570
Thanks ! Could be, because "Starfighter_F-104G" noticed '165570'... Just 2 numbers to invert.raameagle wrote:I'm going with 165750 last noted by me at Norfolk in September 2015 as HU713.
Regards
Mistyping is easy. I am used toraameagle wrote:The official US Navy site quotes 165570 so yes, I think they have got the 5 and the 7 the wrong way round!
Regards
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more