Moderator: gatso76
When and where did they do that? Any link you can share with us?aviodromefriend wrote:Maybe the EU should not have been so quick at pointing out these rules were not applicable to the ash thing (within 24 hours after it all started)
At a press conference in Brussels at the day they closed the airspace. One day after that it was in the newspapers. (Sorry, don't have a link, Internet is not the only source I use to follow the news.)Stefan wrote:When and where did they do that? Any link you can share with us?
Regards,
Stefan
Just doing a Google search [EU sluiting luchtruim] will give you enough food for thought.Stefan wrote: When and where did they do that? Any link you can share with us?
Well, it did'nt. All I know and found is that the EU still enforces it own regulation (as they should). Maybe it was an individual speaking(as in; not representing the EU)?Rockville wrote:Just doing a Google search [EU sluiting luchtruim] will give you enough food for thought.Stefan wrote: When and where did they do that? Any link you can share with us?
That just depends on how well you read the regulation and how you chose to interpret it.streep wrote:The EU is good at causing confusion.
There has always been a distinction between compensation and 'taking care of your customers'. In this case no compensation indeed, but the obligation to 'take care'.streep wrote:Reading this Q&A KLM is doing the right thing, published by the EU.
If it is that easy to interpret it completely different, means it is confusing.Stefan wrote:That just depends on how well you read the regulation and how you chose to interpret it.streep wrote:The EU is good at causing confusion.
In the EU rule, taking care of and providing compensation are two seperate issues.Stefan wrote:There has always been a distinction between compensation and 'taking care of your customers'. In this case no compensation indeed, but the obligation to 'take care'.streep wrote:Reading this Q&A KLM is doing the right thing, published by the EU.
Which is exactly what I said...streep wrote:In the EU rule, taking care of and providing compensation are two seperate issues.
Yeah right... then we must have been the only exceptions to this rulestreep wrote:All passengers were given assistance, though because of the extreme nature of this event not all were given a hotel, as they were clearly not avaiable in these numbers. The lack of information provided by the airlines, regarding solutions, were mainly caused by the fact that nobody knew when the airspace would be reopened.
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more