 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
I wacked them trough photoshop; Thats what I call quick and dirty!You might want to check your sharpening in PS, it looks like you've done it a bit too much. Look at the line at the nose of the USAF Gulfstream in the last picture, it's kinda rigged.
Seems to me the 'secret tip' from Evert is that less sharpening is not more work but looks better. IMHO that is the only thing that needs adjustment for photos of this size and use, meaning quick and dirty would be really all you need if you do it slightly different.FALCONCREST wrote:Thats what I call quick and dirty!
Not exactly what I meant. You got some 'halos' and some 'jaggies', both signs of oversharpening (possibly combined with Shadow/Highlight Tool). Look at the Greek Gulf for instance: halos best visible around the main gear, jaggies in leading edges, roundel and regi (the cheatlines are a different story, near-horizontal lines get distorted at this resolution anyway).FALCONCREST wrote:Actually, I've noticed the nose is out of focus... !
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
