ETAD 03-09-2010

ImageThe forum for all movements and news about Spangdahlem Air Base.

Forum rules
ImageMode S / SBS and radio logs, airfield specific, are allowed, but always state your source, mode S / SBS or air traffic conversations. These logs can be placed in the "day topic" so a separate Mode S / SBS radio log is not necessary
Post Reply
User avatar
Nielis
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 623
Joined: 22 Dec 2007, 12:22
Type of spotter: Photo's and Serials
Subscriber Scramble: Nielis
Location: Lienden, The Netherlands
Contact:

ETAD 03-09-2010

Post by Nielis »

Did some spotting today at SPM. I was there between 8.15LT-16.35LT.

The following F-16 flew a mission from 8.30 until 14.00. They probably made a diversion to ETAR in this time frame because until 12.00 the cloud base was only 200ft and there was some very heavy fog.

F-16CJ:
92-0918
90-0828
91-0344
91-0403
96-0080
96-0083
91-0360
91-0343
91-0402
91-0366

There were five C-17 at the platform:
02-1112
07-7173 departed around 13.45
07-7176
07-7169
Unknown C-17 departed around 13.00

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Last edited by Nielis on 04 Sep 2010, 11:41, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
r.e.hendriks
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 2485
Joined: 25 Nov 2002, 12:05
Type of spotter: fly-by.nl
Subscriber Scramble: 1990>
Location: Uden, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: ETAR 03-09-2010

Post by r.e.hendriks »

You should probably change the title, because ETAR is the location identifier of Ramstein. ETAD = Spangdahlem.

Best regards Rob.
Image
User avatar
Nielis
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 623
Joined: 22 Dec 2007, 12:22
Type of spotter: Photo's and Serials
Subscriber Scramble: Nielis
Location: Lienden, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: ETAR 03-09-2010

Post by Nielis »

Sorry I made a typo. It was very early this morning

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
marco70
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 146
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 21:03
Subscriber Scramble: marco70

Re: ETAD 03-09-2010

Post by marco70 »

De andere C-17 is de 90-0533/HH. Ik was er tussen 11:00 en 11:25 en vond het al verdacht rustig. Op dat moment scheen het zonnetje mooi maar helaas geen enkele vliegbeweging
User avatar
Nielis
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 623
Joined: 22 Dec 2007, 12:22
Type of spotter: Photo's and Serials
Subscriber Scramble: Nielis
Location: Lienden, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: ETAD 03-09-2010

Post by Nielis »

marco70 wrote:De andere C-17 is de 90-0533/HH. Ik was er tussen 11:00 en 11:25 en vond het al verdacht rustig. Op dat moment scheen het zonnetje mooi maar helaas geen enkele vliegbeweging
Zou dit dan niet de 00-0533 moeten zijn?, want volgens mij zijn er geen C-17's in het VY90 gebouwd
Brian
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 937
Joined: 23 Sep 2002, 00:02
Type of spotter: Een die naar vliegtuigen kiekt
Location: EHTW

Re: ETAD 03-09-2010

Post by Brian »

90-0533 is wel degelijk goed. (90-0532 t/m 90-0535)
FY 00 kisten zijn 00-0172 t/m 00-0185.

Ow en 92-0918 moet zijn 92-3918 :)
User avatar
K-9
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1570
Joined: 04 Oct 2004, 16:49
Type of spotter: military
Location: Leiderdorp

Re: ETAD 03-09-2010

Post by K-9 »

/HH in 90-0533/HH ? HH code is only allocated to 8 fy 05 C-17's isn't it ?
joost
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3297
Joined: 10 Jan 2003, 20:09
Location: Grave
Contact:

Re: ETAD 03-09-2010

Post by joost »

K-9 wrote:/HH in 90-0533/HH ? HH code is only allocated to 8 fy 05 C-17's isn't it ?
Believe this one was transfered to 15WG some months ago
User avatar
Nielis
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 623
Joined: 22 Dec 2007, 12:22
Type of spotter: Photo's and Serials
Subscriber Scramble: Nielis
Location: Lienden, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: ETAD 03-09-2010

Post by Nielis »

thanks everybody for the corrections didn't know that there were any C-17's build in 1990
User avatar
Nielis
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 623
Joined: 22 Dec 2007, 12:22
Type of spotter: Photo's and Serials
Subscriber Scramble: Nielis
Location: Lienden, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: ETAD 03-09-2010

Post by Nielis »

Here is some additional information about the F-16CJ that flew that:

92-3918 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
90-0828 Red Tailband Stingers
91-0344 Blue/Red Tailband Stingers
91-0403 Red/Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
96-0080 Red Tailband Warhawks
96-0083 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0360 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0343 Red Tailband Stingers
91-0402 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0366 Red Tailband Warhawks

I hope this is the information were you been looking for Joris

Nielis
marco70
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 146
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 21:03
Subscriber Scramble: marco70

Re: ETAD 03-09-2010

Post by marco70 »

100% of the code HH. It's on photo
Joris Heeren
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 300
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 14:18
Subscriber Scramble: Joris Heeren

Re: ETAD 03-09-2010

Post by Joris Heeren »

Nielis wrote:Here is some additional information about the F-16CJ that flew that:

92-3918 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
90-0828 Red Tailband Stingers
91-0344 Blue/Red Tailband Stingers
91-0403 Red/Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
96-0080 Red Tailband Warhawks
96-0083 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0360 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0343 Red Tailband Stingers
91-0402 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0366 Red Tailband Warhawks

I hope this is the information were you been looking for Joris
Yep, that is exactly the info I was looking for, thanks a lot!

Joris
Post Reply

Return to “Spangdahlem”