F-16 ADF question

ImageSocial talk and other non-aviation topics including photos. Note this a FUN area!

Forum rules
Image
Post Reply
User avatar
nilsko
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1390
Joined: 06 Sep 2002, 14:53
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: No
Location: Doorn
Contact:

F-16 ADF question

Post by nilsko »

While checking out the several F-16A/B variants (blocks etc.) I also came across the F-16 ADF / Block 15 variants which used to be in service by the AMI (leased from the USAF) and still in operational use by the ANG. One of the most distinctive features is the "bulge"on the tail which houses the hydraulic accumulators of the HF subsystem (more info (among other sources) here: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_versions_article14.html).

This is all nice and dandy, but I was wondering why this version is equipped with HF antenna's whereas usually only VHF/UHF radios are present. Can someone enlighten my in the actually application of this HF system and why it's used in this F-16 variant?
User avatar
Flyboy
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2705
Joined: 14 Sep 2006, 09:39
Type of spotter: F4
Subscriber Scramble: Flyboy
Location: Hillywood
Contact:

Re: F-16 ADF question

Post by Flyboy »

As the usage of uhf/vhf is limited to the visual horizon, one get dependant on relay stations for communication. Hf has a better range, so if an intercept moves you over water ( toward the southern part of the mediteranean...) you can stay in contact with command without the depenancy of an awacs or satalites. Bombers and long range patrol use it all the time..,
User avatar
Bennie
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 16428
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:12
Type of spotter: Military (numbers & photography)
Subscriber Scramble: Ofcourse
Location: @ home, @ work or elsewhere in the world!

Re: F-16 ADF question

Post by Bennie »

Flyboy wrote:As the usage of uhf/vhf is limited to the visual horizon, one get dependant on relay stations for communication. Hf has a better range, so if an intercept moves you over water ( toward the southern part of the mediteranean...) you can stay in contact with command without the depenancy of an awacs or satalites. Bombers and long range patrol use it all the time..,
The range of VHF radio is approximately 1.2 times the square root of the altitude in feet (result= Nautical Miles)... Don't know if there's a large difference with UHF, but you'd have to be low and far away from the Italian coast not to be covered by it.... :?
The distance between Rome and Sardegna is roughly 165NM as the crow flies... and if you put a transmitter/receiver on both sides.....
Last edited by Bennie on 18 Aug 2016, 10:03, edited 1 time in total.
Ben
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
User avatar
pjotrtje
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3356
Joined: 30 Jan 2004, 10:12
Subscriber Scramble: Pi

Re: F-16 ADF question

Post by pjotrtje »

Of course the HF transmitter was not needed for Italy, but it was necessary for the role the F-16 ADF was envisaged to perform in the USA and Canada. There's large areas (in Northern Canada mainly) where UHF and VHF are at the limit of their capabilities.

And the reason the Italians operated them? They were reasonably available, quickly, at a limited cost, with the right armament.
== All is well, as long as we keep spinning ==
User avatar
nilsko
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1390
Joined: 06 Sep 2002, 14:53
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: No
Location: Doorn
Contact:

Re: F-16 ADF question

Post by nilsko »

Thanx for the background info. I am particulary interested in why HF radios where used for the ADF version, but pjotr's explanation makes perfect sense..
User avatar
Richard from Rotterdam
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2653
Joined: 09 Aug 2004, 12:38

Re: F-16 ADF question

Post by Richard from Rotterdam »

I don't think the ANG still uses the ADF anymore though. Haven't all the Air Defence units swapped their A's for C's?
Post Reply

Return to “Tattle Lounge”