 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
F16 USAF by Jos Leendertse, on Flickr
F16 USAF by Jos Leendertse, on Flickr
F16 USAF by Jos Leendertse, on Flickr
F16 USAF by Jos Leendertse, on Flickr
F22 USAF by Jos Leendertse, on Flickr
F22 USAF by Jos Leendertse, on Flickr
F22 USAF by Jos Leendertse, on Flickr
F22 USAF by Jos Leendertse, on Flickr
F-22A 05-4089 95th FS
F-22A 05-4089 95th FS
F-22A 05-4097 95th FS
F-22A 05-4097 95th FS
+1Paveway wrote:Very nice shots!
I use the EF 100-400 Lens! Thanks for your answer. Without converter it allows to get pretty sharp shots !!Tobby wrote:Thanks for your Comment!
I forgot ... By the way, for the Nikon users, in 15 days, a Nikkor 200-500 mm 5.6 (constant !!) will be release, at a price around 1600 EUR.Tobby wrote:Thanks for your Comment!
, but the first pro testers gaved a high grade to this lens.
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
/usaf.gif)
